Skip to content
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/mame/irem/m62.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ ROM_START( kungfub3s )
ROM_LOAD( "5.bin", 0x4000, 0x4000, CRC(8e7e4c56) SHA1(fdb79fcc652f1d0af74517e5df75921e8d3ca50f) )

ROM_REGION( 0x10000, "irem_audio:iremsound", 0 )
ROM_LOAD( "3.bin", 0xa000, 0x2000, BAD_DUMP CRC(b4293435) SHA1(5e2b96c19c4f5c63a5afa2de504d29fe64a4c908) ) // Empty ROM
ROM_LOAD( "3.bin", 0xa000, 0x2000, NO_DUMP )
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@angelosa angelosa May 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs ROMREGION_ERASEFF to preserve current behaviour (the ROM is 1-filled).

Assuming we even want to do this, looks a YAGNI to me?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just trying to avoid false positives when looking for new dumps matches...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The ROMREGION_ERASEFF fills not just the part where the dead ROM was, but also the unused part below 0xa000 with 0xff. Not sure if that’s desired. Does 0xff vs 0x00 in the dead ROM space really improve anything for the 6803?

ROM_LOAD( "2.bin", 0xc000, 0x2000, CRC(c81e31ea) SHA1(f0fc58b929188c8802cd85549bdf9f4566e6a677) ) // samples (ADPCM 4-bit)
ROM_LOAD( "1.bin", 0xe000, 0x2000, CRC(d99fb995) SHA1(caa6acdbc3b02d248fd123be95ea6fdcb4f35b59) )

Expand Down
Loading