Properly Counting maxDepth as no. of Doublets in the CA#50898
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50898/49253 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
c89b874 to
3139046
Compare
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50898/49254 Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
3139046 to
bcd7aaf
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50898/49255 |
|
enable gpu |
|
please test for CMSSW_17_0_ASAN_X |
|
please test workflow 34634.114 for CMSSW_17_0_UBSAN_X |
|
please test lets run default tests too |
|
please test workflow 34634.114 with #50882 for CMSSW_17_0_UBSAN_X |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b17025/53120/summary.html |
|
The ASAN tests seem somehow to be stuck or do you think we should wait a bit longer @smuzaffar ? Thank you |
|
type bug-fix |
I have restarted the ASAN relval job but this PR has fixed the issue we have seen in the UBSAN IBs. https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b17025/53120/runTheMatrix-results/34634.114_TTbar_14TeV+Run4D121PU_OTInefficiency10PC/step2_TTbar_14TeV+Run4D121PU_OTInefficiency10PC.log does not show the run time error any more. So feel free to sign it |
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b17025/53114/summary.html |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR proposes a small fix to the issue seen in #49525. The problem was actually understood by @elusian, and it's due to the fact that
maxDepthis the max number ofCACells that can compose an n-Tuplet. This means each track can have up tomaxDepth + 1hits. The container is sized to bemaxDepth + 2to take into account the extra fishbone hits. But it should actually bemaxDepth + 1 + 2.PR validation:
runs in
CMSSW_17_0_ASAN_X_2026-05-06-2300.