Simplified updating interface and caching improvements#12
Open
mikolalysenko wants to merge 9 commits into
Open
Simplified updating interface and caching improvements#12mikolalysenko wants to merge 9 commits into
mikolalysenko wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Summary of changes:
|
Member
|
Looks good to me! :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change set replaces
.updateExports()with a simpler method called.update(). This new method takes a new vertex/fragment shader runs them.If there is a down vote on this, then I will merge this change set into
gl-shader.Longer term, I think that maybe glslify should move to
sourceOnlyas the default and only option, then the particular choice of shader wrapper wouldn't matter as much.