CloudStreamPackage: migrate to kotlinx serialization

[Luna712]

No description provided.

[fire-light42]

I think we've run into the first null issue from #2897

Java.lang.AssertionError: Serialization mismatch for:
com.lagradost.cloudstream3.actions.temp.CloudStreamPackage.MinimalVideoLink

Jackson:
{"uri":null,"url":"YRZOHJ","mimeType":"QSIUJMXEP","name":"NHOIYX","headers":{"UDHQNR":"CZDV","CQTCZKYKWN":"KGRYBRD","DXAOWNP":"XDQXGLZAOC"},"quality":1779}

Kotlinx:
{"url":"YRZOHJ","mimeType":"QSIUJMXEP","name":"NHOIYX","headers":{"UDHQNR":"CZDV","CQTCZKYKWN":"KGRYBRD","DXAOWNP":"XDQXGLZAOC"},"quality":1779}

However, this can be sidestepped by making Instancio create a valid Uri-type (we should really have this for all troublesome types):

val instance = Instancio.of(kClass.java).lenient().supply(all(Uri::class.java), Supplier {
    Uri.parse("https://example.com")
}).create()

But this gives

com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.InvalidDefinitionException: Direct self-reference leading to cycle (through reference chain: com.lagradost.cloudstream3.actions.temp.CloudStreamPackage$MinimalVideoLink["uri"]->android.net.Uri$StringUri["canonicalUri"])

Meaning that Jackson actually cannot serialize it properly 😬
Perhaps we also need custom JsonDeserializer for jackson? What do you think is best?

[Luna712]

Tbh I think the best option here is to add a temporary annotation that can skip certain classes in tests and drop worrying about Jackson for things like this. I feel focusing on fixing Jackson to match kotlinx exactly is a waste of time for things like this when Jackson is being phased out. But it is up to you.