Automatically set units and precision in rules#391
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #391 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 71.26% 71.26%
Complexity 6710 6710
=========================================
Files 657 657
Lines 22245 22245
Branches 3572 3572
=========================================
Hits 15853 15853
Misses 4698 4698
Partials 1694 1694
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
| CAttribute precision = template.getDefinition().itemAtPath(pathOfParent + "/precision"); | ||
|
|
||
| if (units.getChildren().size() != 1 || precision.getChildren().size() != 1) | ||
| return result; // Only fix if there is 1 unit and 1 precision, don't assume anything otherwise |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You could split these two checks for more auto-fixing.
Also note that precision.getChildren() contains intervals, and you cannot use those.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
and you cannot use those.
Not exactly sure what you mean, am I not allowed to do a precision.getChildren().size() != 1?
|
|
||
| // Fix units | ||
| CString cString = (CString) units.getChildren().get(0); | ||
| String assumedUnitValue = cString.getAssumedValue(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
assumed value won't work, that's an explicitly set thing in ADL. You need the actual first+only constraint here, need to check if it's not a regular expression (starts+ends with / or ^), and set it.
|
|
||
| // Fix precision | ||
| CInteger cInteger = (CInteger) units.getChildren().get(0); | ||
| long assumedPrecisionValue = cInteger.getAssumedValue(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
assumed value won't work, that's an explicitly set thing in ADL. You need the actual first+only constraint here. This constraint will be an Interval<Long>. If interval.isUpperBounded(), you can set precision to -1.
Otherwise, if interval.isUpperIncluded() set it to interval.upper
else set it to interval.upper -1.
|
|
||
| private static Map<String, Object> fixDvQuantity(Object rmObject, Archetype archetype, String pathOfParent) { | ||
| try { | ||
| Map<String, Object> result = new HashMap<>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Two more todo's:
- check if actually the magnitude is being set (see the pathOfParent.endsWith contruction elsewhere)
- if units or precision already have a value, should they be set? You probably do not want to override a value set manually or with a different rule elsewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
check if actually the magnitude is being set (see the pathOfParent.endsWith contruction elsewhere)
I only see .../value in the pathOfParent when these quantities are being set by rule evaluation. Not sure how that would work then, or should I expect a .../value/magnitude path or something.
EdwardvanRaak
force-pushed
the
fix-quantity-rules
branch
from
9c8fc92 to
f9d219f
Compare
EdwardvanRaak
force-pushed
the
fix-quantity-rules
branch
from
f9d219f to
2ab72e3
Compare
EdwardvanRaak
force-pushed
the
fix-quantity-rules
branch
from
2ab72e3 to
8aec62b
Compare
3 participants
For some testing on mobile implementation for now.
No tests yet