-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Fix cache misses with content negotiation #5623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Matteo Mazza (matteomazza91)
wants to merge
2
commits into
ktorio:main
Choose a base branch
from
matteomazza91:fix-cache-misses-with-content-negotiation
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regression assertion is currently tautological and can miss separator regressions.
storedandlookupare both built via the samejoinHeaderValues()call, so this test can still pass if both paths regress to the same wrong separator. Assert the exact expected RFC-compliant value to make this test fail on separator drift.Suggested patch
fun varyKeysSeparatorMatchesMergedHeadersLookupSeparator() { val requestHeaders = Headers.build { append(HttpHeaders.Accept, "application/vnd.github+json") // set by caller append(HttpHeaders.Accept, "application/json") // appended by ContentNegotiation } // How HttpCacheEntry.varyKeys() stores the value (joinHeaderValues → comma): val stored = requestHeaders.getAll(HttpHeaders.Accept).joinHeaderValues() - // → "application/vnd.github+json,application/json" + val expected = "application/vnd.github+json,application/json" // How mergedHeadersLookup() now computes the lookup value (joinHeaderValues → comma): val lookup = requestHeaders.getAll(HttpHeaders.Accept).joinHeaderValues() - // → "application/vnd.github+json,application/json" - + + assertEquals(expected, stored) + assertEquals(expected, lookup) assertEquals(stored, lookup) }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's not important that the serialization complies with the RFC as this is not sent on the network. It's just an internal representation.
that's the intention of the PR. To avoid an implicit dependency of 2 pieces of code that needs to be serialized with the same format. The new function forces an explicit dependency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@matteomazza91, that makes sense — the test is intentionally documenting the shared dependency onjoinHeaderValues(), making it explicit that bothvaryKeys()andmergedHeadersLookup()must use the same function rather than two independent inline joins that could silently drift. The integration tests (cacheHitOccursWithContentNegotiationAndVaryAccept) provide the behavioral safety net ifjoinHeaderValues()itself ever regresses. Understood and acknowledged!(ᵔᴥᵔ)🐇
🧠 Learnings used