Fix issue 651 - additional changes AvoidMultipleConcatStatements#691
Open
Fix issue 651 - additional changes AvoidMultipleConcatStatements#691
Conversation
|
stokpop
changed the title
Owner
|
Seems like a hack. How about this pattern in non-hashCode fun's? |
jborgers
reviewed
Feb 6, 2026
Owner
jborgers
left a comment
jborgers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this only for hashCode? Other methods working with Int?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
merge
found hashCode false positive
now exclude on hashCode fun, but that if obvious String concat is inside hashCode it is not found: added INACTIVE test for this, to be fixed when needed