-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
Add log_train_loss_on_step toggle to EasySyntax #886
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sevmag
wants to merge
5
commits into
graphnet-team:main
Choose a base branch
from
sevmag:feature/log-train-loss-on-step
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
470d077
Add log_train_loss_on_step toggle to EasySyntax
sevmag d4e3508
Apply suggestions from code review
christianlocatelli 1152aa7
Fix botched code-review suggestion apply
sevmag 4dd59b7
using canonical on_step and on_epoch kwargs
sevmag 07b2c72
setting the correct attributes
sevmag File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And then expose the logging setting to the class. This removes duplicate code and then we don't have to define the batch_size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense, but how do we want to handle the logging of the val loss?
log_on_epochandlog_on_stepfor me sounds like you log both val and train on epoch and or step, which I think could also be valid (personally I log train on log and step and val only on epoch). As long as we agree on something together I think either way is fineUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is fine to have the logging of the validation and train loss behave in the same way. In principle we could separate the arguments for validation and training, but I think that is a little too many arguments, and moving towards instances where people should just create their own torch-lightning callbacks.