Add the inlay package#261
Conversation
|
Cool, thanks! Is the package ready? It seems there's some incomplete type definitions that have no purpose with the published version: https://github.com/kkostov/inlay/blob/b8813ffb71612fe4be5e336d55f20dc6aabc7d88/src/inlay/embed.gleam#L90-L96 Most the documentation is missing, so it's not clear to me as a reader what anything is or how it should be used. Could you document the public API please 🙏 There's a lot of very small modules, a pluralised module name segment, and grouping by design pattern for "providers", all of which are not idiomatic Gleam.
Would it be possible to adopt the Gleam conventions? Would be fab for the "awesome" libraries to be good references for people learning Gleam. |
|
Oh thanks for the review. I will sort this out! |
|
Thank you!! 🤩 |
|
This was a very fun and educational exercise - I should've done it when I started learning about Gleam 🤩. inlay v2 is out with some API improvements and cleanups kkostov/inlay#3 |
Adds the inlay package to the Frontend section.