Skip to content

[16.0.X] [NGT] Add ScoutingDiMuonVertexMonitor for HLT scouting DQM#50958

Open
mmusich wants to merge 6 commits into
cms-sw:CMSSW_16_0_Xfrom
mmusich:mm_dev_ScoutingDiMuonVertexMonitor_16_0_X
Open

[16.0.X] [NGT] Add ScoutingDiMuonVertexMonitor for HLT scouting DQM#50958
mmusich wants to merge 6 commits into
cms-sw:CMSSW_16_0_Xfrom
mmusich:mm_dev_ScoutingDiMuonVertexMonitor_16_0_X

Conversation

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented May 17, 2026

backport of #50926

PR description:

From the original PR description:

This PR introduces a new ScoutingDiMuonVertexMonitor module for HLT scouting DQM.
The new monitor adds basic validation and histogramming of dimuon vertex quantities from scouting collections, improving online/offline monitoring coverage for scouting workflows especially in terms of impact of tracking / tracker alignment.
No changes to event content or reconstruction output are expected.
No additional dependencies are required.

PR validation:

See master's PR.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Verbatim backport of #50926 for 2026 data-taking operations.

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 17, 2026

type ngt

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 17, 2026

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for CMSSW_16_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/HLTEvF (dqm, hlt)
  • DQM/Integration (dqm)
  • DQMOffline/HLTScouting (dqm)
  • HLTriggerOffline/Scouting (dqm)

@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @mmusich, @rseidita can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@batinkov, @francescobrivio, @missirol, @mtosi, @rociovilar, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 17, 2026

cms-bot internal usage

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 17, 2026

type ngt

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 17, 2026

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0f8356/53289/summary.html
COMMIT: c1e152c
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_0_X_2026-05-17-0000/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/50958/53289/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 1 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 10 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4172318
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4172295
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 66.568 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 18434.0,... ): 16.642 KiB HLT/ScoutingOffline
  • Checked 227 log files, 197 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 17, 2026

+hlt

@gabrielmscampos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

+dqm

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_16_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_17_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants