Testing 4 GPU relvals in parallel#2747
Conversation
|
enable gpu |
|
please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for branch master. @akritkbehera, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b5835b/53234/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
|
Pull request #2747 was updated. |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-AMD_W7900 Failed RelVals-AMD_W7900
Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b5835b/53250/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
By default we run N jobs in parallel for GPU relvals (where N is number of GPU available mostly 1). This PR s to test if we can run multiple relvals in parallel