Skip to content

docs: update changelog for v0.1.8#196

Merged
MichaelWalker-git merged 1 commit intomainfrom
release/v0.1.8
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

docs: update changelog for v0.1.8#196
MichaelWalker-git merged 1 commit intomainfrom
release/v0.1.8

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Release v0.1.8

Warning

All other pull requests are blocked until merged or closed

This pull request is for the v0.1.8 release.

Checklist (in order)

  1. Mark the pull request "Ready for review" and label with "codebuild" to trigger required workflows
  2. Inspect the CHANGELOG.md and "Approve" or "Reject" the pending CodeBuild GitHub Action
  3. Evaluate the artifacts
  4. Review the pull request (if approved set the "Merge when ready")

Post Merge

  • Verify v0.1.8 tag
  • Approve "Approve" or "Reject" the pending CodeBuild GitHub Action
  • Review the drafted release artifacts for completion
  • Publish the release

Caution

Simply closing this will block a subsequent v0.1.8 release, so delete the branch or reopen the pull request if necessary

When merged, the merge commit will be automatically tagged as v0.1.8, which triggers:

  • release.yml — creates a draft GitHub Release with the rules zip
  • codebuild.yml — runs CodeBuild and attaches build artifacts to the draft

After both workflows complete, review and publish the draft release.

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust self-assigned this Apr 20, 2026
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2026 19:23
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust requested review from a team as code owners April 20, 2026 19:24
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 20, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust added the codebuild A label to signal a request for the "CodeBuild" workflow label Apr 20, 2026
@MichaelWalker-git MichaelWalker-git added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 20, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9491dea Apr 20, 2026
33 of 36 checks passed
@MichaelWalker-git MichaelWalker-git deleted the release/v0.1.8 branch April 20, 2026 19:30
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

A. Executive Summary

Latest release: PR #196

High-level snapshot comparing the latest release against the golden baseline (the reference evaluation used as the quality target).

Metric What it measures
Unit tests passed Number of generated unit tests that pass. Higher means the rules produce broader, more complete test suites.
Contract tests API compliance checks against the OpenAPI spec (passed/total). 88/88 = full compliance.
Lint findings Static analysis warnings in generated code. Lower is better — 0 means clean code.
Qualitative score AI-graded quality of generated documentation on a 0–1 scale (higher is better).
Execution time Wall-clock time for the full evaluation run. Lower means faster generation.
Total tokens Total LLM tokens consumed (input + output). Lower means more cost-efficient.
Metric Golden Latest (PR #196) vs Golden Trend
Unit tests passed 180 204 +24 █▄▄▁▂▃▃▁▅
Contract tests 88/88 87/88 -1 ███▁████▅
Lint findings 0 0 ▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅
Qualitative score 0.854 0.802 -0.053 ▅▇▇▆▇█▁▁▂
Execution time 23.8m 18.4m -5.4m ▁▅▁▅▂▄█▆▅
Total tokens 18.39M 6.22M -12.17M ▃▇▃▆▆█▃▁▁

Full trend report available in the workflow artifacts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

codebuild A label to signal a request for the "CodeBuild" workflow documentation Improvements or additions to documentation release rules

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants