Skip to content

fix: Skill 文档未清晰说明 HTTP 云函数的代码编写规范#575

Open
binggg wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mns1xuxr-arrdn2-skill-http-mo6a6m2w
Open

fix: Skill 文档未清晰说明 HTTP 云函数的代码编写规范#575
binggg wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mns1xuxr-arrdn2-skill-http-mo6a6m2w

Conversation

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@binggg binggg commented Apr 19, 2026

Attribution issue

  • issueId: issue_mns1xuxr_arrdn2
  • category: skill
  • canonicalTitle: Skill 文档未清晰说明 HTTP 云函数的代码编写规范
  • representativeRun: atomic-js-cloudbase-http-function-deploy/2026-04-09T22-25-03-vb9b0z

Automation summary

  • root_cause: The issue is a real product-facing documentation defect in this repository. The HTTP cloud function skill already distinguished Event vs HTTP functions, but its detailed HTTP reference still taught Express-based examples and middleware-style req.body handling. That left the native http implementation contract unclear, especially for requests that explicitly require Node.js built-in http, manual body parsing, explicit JSON responses, and the HTTP-function runtime shape.
  • changes: Updated config/source/skills/cloud-functions/references/http-functions.md to make the HTTP function code-writing contract explicit. The reference now prefers Node.js native http for simple HTTP APIs, uses a Node 18 scf_bootstrap example, replaces the Express samples with native http examples, and adds concrete rules for manual routing, request-body parsing, JSON response headers, 404 vs 405, port 9000, and avoiding exports.main(...) in HTTP functions.
  • validation: Ran git diff --check -- config/source/skills/cloud-functions/references/http-functions.md with no issues. Also reviewed the final diff to confirm the change is limited to product-facing skill documentation a

Changed files

  • config/source/skills/cloud-functions/references/http-functions.md

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

binggg commented Apr 20, 2026

Attribution post-PR evaluation

  • visibility: internal identifiers, run ids, and private links are intentionally omitted
  • attempt: 3
  • eval_scope: primary_only
  • overall: FAILED
  • summary: at least one planned evaluation case failed
  • updated_at: 2026-04-20T15:44:09.825Z

Cases

  • [FAILED] — primary — evaluation failed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant