Skip to content

fix: CloudBase JS SDK Skill 文档缺乏认证状态同步与存储 API 使用说明#559

Open
binggg wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mnrz9iv5-2a0jmm-cloudbase-js-sdk-skill-api
Open

fix: CloudBase JS SDK Skill 文档缺乏认证状态同步与存储 API 使用说明#559
binggg wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mnrz9iv5-2a0jmm-cloudbase-js-sdk-skill-api

Conversation

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@binggg binggg commented Apr 17, 2026

Attribution issue

  • issueId: issue_mnrz9iv5_2a0jmm
  • category: skill
  • canonicalTitle: CloudBase JS SDK Skill 文档缺乏认证状态同步与存储 API 使用说明
  • representativeRun: application-js-react-cloudbase-cms-scaffold/2026-04-09T21-10-58-aaa0a8

Automation summary

  • root_cause: This is a real product-facing documentation defect in the CloudBase JS SDK skill set. The Web document-database skill covered CRUD and permissions, but it did not explicitly tell agents to wait for browser auth/session restoration before the first protected query, and it did not explain that file-bearing fields such as coverImage must be handled through Cloud Storage APIs first and only then persisted as database references. In CMS-style Web tasks, that gap can lead to anonymous-looking first reads after refresh and incorrect storage/database usage.
  • changes: Updated config/source/skills/no-sql-web-sdk/SKILL.md with the minimal product-facing fix: added a sibling reference to the Cloud Storage Web skill, expanded common gotchas/checklist items, documented an auth-state synchronization pattern using auth.onAuthStateChange(...) before protected CRUD, and added a storage-boundary section showing app.uploadFile(), app.getTempFileURL(), and app.deleteFile() as the correct path for document fields backed by uploaded files.
  • validation: Read the available internal evaluation evidence and the related skill docs, reviewed the resulting diff, and ran a small conte

Changed files

  • config/source/skills/no-sql-web-sdk/SKILL.md

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

binggg commented Apr 18, 2026

Attribution post-PR evaluation

  • visibility: internal identifiers, run ids, and private links are intentionally omitted
  • attempt: 1
  • eval_scope: primary_only
  • overall: FAILED
  • summary: at least one planned evaluation case failed
  • updated_at: 2026-04-19T17:43:11.816Z

Cases

  • [FAILED] — primary — evaluation failed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant