Skip to content

fix: Skill 未引导正确处理环境ID的简写与完整形式#558

Open
binggg wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mnovxo2g-pc6qna-skill-id
Open

fix: Skill 未引导正确处理环境ID的简写与完整形式#558
binggg wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mnovxo2g-pc6qna-skill-id

Conversation

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@binggg binggg commented Apr 17, 2026

Attribution issue

  • issueId: issue_mnovxo2g_pc6qna
  • category: skill
  • canonicalTitle: Skill 未引导正确处理环境ID的简写与完整形式
  • representativeRun: application-js-react-cloudbase-phone-signup/2026-04-09T21-19-12-8cfnsp

Automation summary

  • root_cause: This is a real product defect in the skill guidance. The canonical CloudBase guidance told agents to use the environment ID from envQuery, but it did not explicitly instruct them to resolve alias-like shorthand or nicknames to the canonical full EnvId before calling auth.set_env, initializing SDKs, generating config, or building console links. That gap can produce user-visible mistakes in normal usage, not just in evaluation.
  • changes: Added minimal product-facing guidance in the main CloudBase guideline, the platform overview skill, and the editor compatibility guide to require envQuery(action=list, alias=..., aliasExact=true) when the conversation only contains an environment alias or shorthand, and to stop for clarification when the alias is ambiguous. Also added a focused regression test that asserts this guidance is present in those canonical surfaces.
  • validation: Reviewed the diff to confirm it adds guidance only, with no benchmark-only aliases or duplicate field variants. Ran a small static validation script to verify the new alias-resolution instructions and regression test text are present; it passed (static-validation: ok). I did not run the Vit

Changed files

  • config/source/editor-config/guides/cloudbase-rules.mdc
  • config/source/guideline/cloudbase/SKILL.md
  • config/source/skills/cloudbase-platform/SKILL.md
  • tests/skill-quality-standards.test.js

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

binggg commented Apr 18, 2026

Attribution post-PR evaluation

  • visibility: internal identifiers, run ids, and private links are intentionally omitted
  • attempt: 1
  • eval_scope: primary_plus_regression
  • overall: FAILED
  • summary: at least one planned evaluation case failed
  • updated_at: 2026-04-19T17:54:23.329Z

Cases

  • [FAILED] — primary — evaluation failed
  • [PENDING] — regression 1 — queued

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant