Conversation
If not, skip the build as the job will fail
|
This change makes it clear why PRs from forks fail to run. |
| echo "have-secrets=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT | ||
| else | ||
| echo "❌ Missing required secrets: ${missing[*]}" | ||
| echo "⚠️ PRs must be sent from branches, not forks!" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is slightly contradicting. either we tell people to set the secrets (which they could on forks) or we forbid running from forks. that would be simpler to achieve:
if [ ${{github.repository }} ] != "SUSE/BCI-dockerfile-generator" ]; then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You could run on a fork if you have the proper secrets. It is possible to share secrets with forks, but this is security issue, so a no-go IMHO.
Not everyone can create a branch to send a PR, so yes, the message does not help much.
We could skip the run instead of failing with an error, not sure what is the best user experience here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think anyone has the right secrets (or we shouldn't advertise people putting their OSC access tokens into github, far too dangerous).
I suggest to only go with the "check if it is a fork, then don't run the jobs" approach instead. this doesn't advertise contributors to do an unsafe operation.
|
|
||
| obs-build: | ||
| needs: check-secrets | ||
| if: needs.check-secrets.outputs.have-secrets == 'true' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the needs alone causes it to be skipped so the if should be unnecessary? haven't tested it though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, the if might be removed if we dont write the file on failures perhaps, because we current write a value and read the value.
2 participants
If not, skip the build as the job will fail