fix(mavlink): preserve -1 marker in battery fields#27142
Merged
dakejahl merged 1 commit intoMay 5, 2026
Conversation
Contributor
🔎 FLASH Analysispx4_fmu-v5x [Total VM Diff: 152 byte (0.01 %)]px4_fmu-v6x [Total VM Diff: 160 byte (0.01 %)]Updated: 2026-04-30T08:32:35 |
Member
|
This essentially prevents negative currents right? |
346e990 to
ea7fc8c
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I reasoned that the mavlink specification already prevents negative currents by using -1 as the invalid value, but I agree with your point. Now scaling is only skipped if the |
dakejahl
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2026
dakejahl
previously approved these changes
Apr 30, 2026
ea7fc8c to
5927127
Compare
dakejahl
approved these changes
May 5, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Solved Problem
Fixes #27141
Solution
Check whether fields are negative before scaling
Changelog Entry
For release notes:
Alternatives
I guess we could pass -0.01 from SITL and get -1 with scaling, or pass
battery_status.connected = falseTest coverage
Ran unit + integration tests, no regression
First PR, so open to any comments