Skip to content

Emnlp demo publication#376

Draft
vkehfdl1 wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
emnlp-demo-publication
Draft

Emnlp demo publication#376
vkehfdl1 wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
emnlp-demo-publication

Conversation

@vkehfdl1

@vkehfdl1 vkehfdl1 commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

vkehfdl1 and others added 9 commits July 4, 2026 15:45
… original)

Three planning artifacts for the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets Track
submission, branch experiment/paper-publication.

ACTIVE PLAN: docs/plans/neurips-2026-experimentation-plan-FULL.md
This is the primary working document with detailed calculations.

- neurips-2026-experimentation-plan.md
  Original draft. Broad scope (20+ pipelines x 9 datasets x all metrics).

- neurips-2026-experimentation-plan-REVISED.md
  Critique-driven downscoping for May 2026 deadline (4 retrieval x 4 gen x
  3 datasets, single-claim focus).

- neurips-2026-experimentation-plan-FULL.md (PRIMARY, updated)
  Full-coverage plan targeting NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL 2027. Includes:
  * Verified pipeline/dataset/metric inventory (10 retr + 10 gen + 21 metrics)
  * Statistical Power Analysis with MDES per dataset
  * Local-vLLM dual-backend design (Qwen 3.6 + Gemma 4 on 2x RTX PRO 6000
    Blackwell), eliminating API generation cost
  * GPU-time-centric resource model (~41 wall-clock days, ~$3.6K judge API)
  * Cross-LLM-backend ranking-stability analysis as new primary finding
  * Appendix H with traceable calculation methodology and 12-item assumption
    register including Phase 0 critical sensitivity checks
The paper direction now centers on the framework properties that make RAG reimplementation cheaper: unified dataset ingestors, shareable embedded corpus dumps, preimplemented pipelines, and reusable metrics. The NeurIPS starter kit, manuscript, compiled PDF, browser preview, framework-paper pattern notes, and experiment-plan review artifacts are committed together so the paper package is reviewable as a single artifact.

Constraint: User requested a NeurIPS-style paper artifact rather than only an experiment plan

Constraint: Experimental numeric values remain review markers until real runs populate them

Rejected: Keep dataset subset policy as the main dataset table | it hid the broader ingestor/framework coverage claim

Rejected: Omit expensive pipelines from full-scale experiments | user explicitly required all implemented compatible pipelines

Confidence: high

Scope-risk: narrow

Directive: Preserve the paper's central four-part reuse claim: dataset abstraction, stored embeddings, preimplemented pipelines, preimplemented metrics

Tested: pdflatex + bibtex + pdflatex + pdflatex + pdflatex on paper/neurips2026/main.tex

Not-tested: Full AutoRAG benchmark execution and real result replacement
…ions track

Retarget the publication from NeurIPS 2026 to the EMNLP 2026 demo track
(submission July 10, 2026; 6 content pages + 2 appendix; single-blind).

- Rewrite the manuscript as a system demonstration paper using the
  official ACL style files: system design, novelty vs. existing RAG
  toolkits (FlashRAG, BERGEN, AutoRAG, Pyserini, RAGAs, DSPy,
  LangChain/LlamaIndex), target audience, licensing, and CLI workflow.
- Include the full demo-track experiment design: Track A/B/C benchmark
  setup with fixed-model controls, restored-artifact reproducibility
  measurements, extensibility case study, and key takeaways. Result
  values are gray \res placeholders pending the scripted runs.
- Update coverage to the current codebase: 13 ingestors, 13 retrieval +
  17 generation pipelines, 16 reranker backends, retrieval/generation
  metric suites, Gradio leaderboard.
- Document demo-track requirements and remaining TODOs (screencast
  video, live-demo link, final numbers) in the README.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ntions

Analyzed six recent *ACL demo-track RAG system papers (RAGLAB, RAGViz,
OpenResearcher, RAGAs, LocalRQA, FlexRAG) and applied their consistent
structural and stylistic patterns:

- Add repo URL to the abstract so the code link is on page 1.
- Add Figure 1: full-width five-stage workflow banner (ingest/restore ->
  unified DB -> run -> evaluate -> report/share) at the top of page 2,
  replacing the layered-architecture table; self-contained caption.
- Add a roadmap paragraph with section cross-references to the intro.
- Add a Demonstration Walkthrough section with a running example
  (HyDE vs. BM25 vs. dense retrieval on SciFact), restore command,
  experiment YAML listing, leaderboard drill-down narrative, and a
  three-step extension recipe.
- Extend the comparison table and related-systems prose with the
  demo-track lineage: RAGLAB, LocalRQA, FlexRAG (with citations),
  acknowledging FlexRAG's multimodal scope honestly.
- Add a user study design (reproduce a row + add a metric, completion/
  time/satisfaction placeholders), following RAGLAB's evaluation style.

Body still ends within the 6-page content limit; appendix within 2 pages.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
No time to run it before the July 10 deadline; evaluation keeps the
benchmark study, restored-artifact measurements, and extensibility
case study.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant