feat add testing#2
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation and test infrastructure additions for comprehensive backend testing. Introduces a 586-line test suite with unit tests using mocks and integration tests using Testcontainers + PostgreSQL, alongside supporting documentation, dependency updates, and detailed testing plan and prompts. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@backend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.ts`:
- Around line 401-405: The test instantiates a PostgreSqlContainer with an
unstable image tag ('postgres:latest'); change the image reference in the
PostgreSqlContainer constructor to a pinned, specific Postgres version (e.g.,
'postgres:16') to ensure deterministic CI runs—update the instantiation call
that creates container = await new PostgreSqlContainer(...) so it uses the
chosen fixed tag instead of 'latest'.
In `@test-plan-ALJ.md`:
- Around line 72-405: The MD001 warnings are caused by the "🛑 CHECKPOINT"
headings using ### directly after a top-level "# STEP ..." header; update each
"### 🛑 CHECKPOINT ..." to be one level deeper than its preceding STEP header
(e.g., use "## 🛑 CHECKPOINT ..." when it immediately follows a "# STEP ..."
block) so heading levels increment by one consistently; locate each occurrence
of the "STEP" headers and the adjacent "🛑 CHECKPOINT" headings in the document
(symbols: "STEP" and "🛑 CHECKPOINT") and change the checkpoint headings' hashes
to ensure proper nesting and uniform heading levels throughout the file.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 51178a73-226d-45d5-bd87-419fd6daf310
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
backend/README.mdbackend/package.jsonbackend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.tsprompts.mdtest-plan-ALJ.md
| container = await new PostgreSqlContainer('postgres:latest') | ||
| .withUsername('postgres') | ||
| .withPassword('password') | ||
| .withDatabase('mydatabase') | ||
| .start(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
What are current best practices for pinning PostgreSQL Docker image tags in CI test suites (e.g., postgres:latestvspostgres:16/specific patch tags), and what risks are documented for using latest?
💡 Result:
Current best practices for pinning PostgreSQL Docker image tags in CI test suites recommend using specific version tags like postgres:16 or full patch versions like postgres:16.13 instead of postgres:latest. Pinning to a specific major.minor version (e.g., postgres:16) allows automatic security patch updates while avoiding major version upgrades that could break compatibility. For maximum reproducibility in tests, use exact patch tags. Risks of using postgres:latest include: - Unpredictable major version upgrades (e.g., from 16 to 17), which are complex and can break database data directories or introduce incompatibilities. - Flaky CI tests due to changes in image contents, such as new vulnerabilities, performance regressions, or breaking changes. - Inconsistent behavior across CI runs or machines, as latest is mutable and Docker caches local copies without always checking for updates. - Potential data corruption if tools auto-pull and upgrade databases unexpectedly. Official Docker Postgres docs and maintainers strongly discourage generic tags like latest for production or persistent data use, with an open proposal to remove them entirely to force explicit versioning.
Citations:
- 1: https://docker.com/blog/how-to-use-the-postgres-docker-official-image
- 2: https://sliplane.io/blog/best-practices-for-postgres-in-docker
- 3: Remove "latest" and friends docker-library/postgres#1294
- 4: https://hub.docker.com/r/library/postgres/tags/
- 5: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/postgres
- 6: https://qaskills.sh/blog/docker-testing-strategies-guide
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's verify the actual code at the specified lines
fd -t f 'tests-ALJ.test.ts' backend/Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 114
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the file size to ensure we can read it
wc -l backend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.tsRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 118
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the specific lines mentioned in the review
sed -n '395,410p' backend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.tsRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 740
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for other usages of postgres Docker image references
rg 'postgres:' backend/src/tests/ -nRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 183
🏁 Script executed:
# Check package.json or other config files for postgres version hints
fd -t f -e json -e yml -e yaml backend/src/tests/ | head -20Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 456
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if there's a docker-compose.yml or similar
fd -t f 'docker-compose|compose.yml|package.json' backend/Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 99
🏁 Script executed:
# Look at package.json to see if there are any postgres-related dependencies
cat backend/package.json | grep -A5 -B5 -i postgresRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 446
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for README or documentation files that mention postgres
fd -t f -e md READMERepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 125
🏁 Script executed:
# Check for docker-compose or environment configuration
fd -t f 'docker-compose|.env|.env.example'Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 129
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for any prisma schema or other config that might indicate postgres version
fd -t f 'schema.prisma|prisma' backend/Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 107
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the docker-compose.yml for postgres version
cat docker-compose.ymlRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 304
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the prisma schema for any database version info
cat backend/prisma/schema.prismaRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-tdd-2603-srII
Length of output: 1928
Pin the Postgres image tag to a specific version instead of latest for deterministic CI behavior.
At line 401, using postgres:latest introduces unpredictable behavior in the test suite. The image tag can change between CI runs, causing flaky tests or breaking changes without any repository change. Pin to a stable release version like postgres:16.
Suggested change
- container = await new PostgreSqlContainer('postgres:latest')
+ container = await new PostgreSqlContainer('postgres:16')🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@backend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.ts` around lines 401 - 405, The test
instantiates a PostgreSqlContainer with an unstable image tag
('postgres:latest'); change the image reference in the PostgreSqlContainer
constructor to a pinned, specific Postgres version (e.g., 'postgres:16') to
ensure deterministic CI runs—update the instantiation call that creates
container = await new PostgreSqlContainer(...) so it uses the chosen fixed tag
instead of 'latest'.
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 1 | ||
| - Post the report above. | ||
| - List any surprises or mismatches with this plan. | ||
| - Ask any clarifying questions you have before Step 2. | ||
| - **Wait for me to reply `continue` before proceeding.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 2 — Install dev dependencies | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** In `backend/`, run: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| npm install -D \ | ||
| jest @types/jest ts-jest \ | ||
| jest-mock-extended \ | ||
| supertest @types/supertest \ | ||
| testcontainers @testcontainers/postgresql | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| If `jest`, `ts-jest`, or any of these are already in `devDependencies` at compatible versions, skip those entries. Report the final versions installed. | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 2 | ||
| - Show me `npm ls jest ts-jest jest-mock-extended supertest testcontainers @testcontainers/postgresql` output. | ||
| - Confirm `@prisma/client` and `prisma` are present (they should be). | ||
| - Report any peer-dep warnings. | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 3 — Create `jest.config.ts` and update `package.json` scripts | ||
|
|
||
| **Action 1:** Create `backend/jest.config.ts` with exactly: | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| import type { Config } from 'jest'; | ||
|
|
||
| const config: Config = { | ||
| preset: 'ts-jest', | ||
| testEnvironment: 'node', | ||
| rootDir: '.', | ||
| testMatch: ['<rootDir>/src/tests/**/*.test.ts'], | ||
| testTimeout: 120_000, | ||
| clearMocks: true, | ||
| restoreMocks: true, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export default config; | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **Action 2:** Merge into `backend/package.json` `"scripts"` (preserve existing entries): | ||
|
|
||
| ```json | ||
| { | ||
| "test": "jest --runInBand", | ||
| "test:unit": "jest --runInBand -t 'UNIT'", | ||
| "test:integration": "jest --runInBand -t 'INTEGRATION'", | ||
| "test:all": "jest --runInBand" | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| If a `"test"` script already exists, **ask me** before overwriting — propose renaming the old one to `test:legacy`. | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 3 | ||
| - Show the diff of `package.json`. | ||
| - Show the contents of `jest.config.ts`. | ||
| - Run `npx jest --listTests` (it will find nothing yet — confirm exit code 0). | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 4 — Conditionally split `app` from `app.listen` in `index.ts` | ||
|
|
||
| **Skip this step entirely if** Step 1 confirmed `app` is already exported separately from `app.listen(...)`. | ||
|
|
||
| **Otherwise, action:** Modify `backend/src/index.ts` so: | ||
| - `app` is exported (`export const app = ...` or `export default app`). | ||
| - `app.listen(...)` only runs when the file is the entry point: wrap it in `if (require.main === module) { app.listen(...) }`. | ||
|
|
||
| This is the **only** production-code change permitted by this plan. No other behavior may change. | ||
|
|
||
| If the project is structured as ESM (`"type": "module"` in package.json), use `import.meta.url`-based check instead — **ask me first** if you encounter that. | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 4 | ||
| - Show the before/after diff of `index.ts`. | ||
| - Run `npm run build` (or whatever the build command is) and confirm it still compiles. | ||
| - Run `npm start` briefly to confirm the server still listens on its port, then stop it. | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 5 — Create the test file: imports + helpers + UNIT validator tests | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** Create `backend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.ts` with **only** the imports, top-of-file mocks, helper functions, and the UNIT suite's **Validator** describe block (≥ 7 tests). | ||
|
|
||
| Use the actual import paths and symbol names you discovered in Step 1 — **do not** copy placeholders from this plan blindly. | ||
|
|
||
| Skeleton structure: | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| import { mockDeep, mockReset, DeepMockProxy } from 'jest-mock-extended'; | ||
| import request from 'supertest'; | ||
| import type { PrismaClient } from '@prisma/client'; | ||
|
|
||
| // Neutralise filesystem and (if used) multer BEFORE importing the app | ||
| jest.mock('fs', () => ({ | ||
| ...jest.requireActual('fs'), | ||
| writeFileSync: jest.fn(), | ||
| mkdirSync: jest.fn(), | ||
| existsSync: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(true), | ||
| promises: { | ||
| writeFile: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), | ||
| mkdir: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), | ||
| }, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| // If Step 1 found multer in use, also mock it here. | ||
|
|
||
| // --- Helpers --- | ||
| const validPayload = () => ({ /* mirror the README example, fresh email per call */ }); | ||
|
|
||
| // --- UNIT SUITE --- | ||
| describe('UNIT — mocked, no database', () => { | ||
| describe('Validator', () => { | ||
| // 7 tests — see list below | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **Validator tests to implement (mirror the actual rules you found in Step 1):** | ||
| 1. Accepts a fully valid candidate payload | ||
| 2. Rejects missing `firstName` | ||
| 3. Rejects missing `lastName` | ||
| 4. Rejects invalid email format | ||
| 5. Rejects invalid phone (per the regex actually used) | ||
| 6. Rejects malformed `educations[].startDate` / `endDate` | ||
| 7. Rejects `cv` missing `filePath` or `fileType` | ||
|
|
||
| Run `npm run test:unit` — these 7 must pass. | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 5 | ||
| - Show the test file contents so far. | ||
| - Show `npm run test:unit` output (7/7 green). | ||
| - If any test fails because the validator behaves differently than this plan assumed, **stop and ask me** rather than rewriting the test to "match" buggy behavior. | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 6 — Add UNIT tests for domain models, service, controller, and routes | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** Extend `tests-ALJ.test.ts` (still inside the `UNIT — mocked, no database` describe) with these blocks. Use `jest-mock-extended`'s `mockDeep<PrismaClient>()` and `jest.mock('@prisma/client', ...)` so no Prisma call hits a real DB. | ||
|
|
||
| **Domain models (≥ 3 tests):** | ||
| - `Candidate.save()` (or whatever the project calls it) calls `prisma.candidate.create` with the right shape | ||
| - `Education.save()` and `WorkExperience.save()` link to a candidate id | ||
| - `Resume.save()` persists `filePath` + `fileType` | ||
|
|
||
| **Service `addCandidate` (≥ 4 tests):** | ||
| - Happy path orchestrates validation → candidate save → nested educations/workExperiences/resume | ||
| - Validator failure short-circuits and throws (zero Prisma calls) | ||
| - Repository throws `P2002` (unique-email) → service surfaces a domain error | ||
| - Empty `educations` / `workExperiences` arrays don't trigger creation calls | ||
|
|
||
| **Controller (≥ 4 tests):** use a fake `req`/`res`/`next` and `jest.spyOn(serviceModule, 'addCandidate')`: | ||
| - Returns `201` + payload on success | ||
| - Returns `400` on validation error | ||
| - Returns whatever code the controller actually maps for duplicate-email (4xx) | ||
| - Returns `500` on unexpected error | ||
|
|
||
| **Routes via supertest (≥ 3 tests):** | ||
| - `POST /candidates` reaches the controller and returns `201` (service is spied on, returns a fake candidate) | ||
| - `POST /candidates` with bad body returns `400` | ||
| - Unknown route returns `404` | ||
|
|
||
| Run `npm run test:unit` — all UNIT tests must pass. Total UNIT count should now be **≥ 14**. | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 6 | ||
| - Show the updated test file (or just the new sections). | ||
| - Show `npm run test:unit` output with full pass count. | ||
| - Confirm `npm run test:unit` still works **with Docker stopped** (this is the contract — unit tests must not require Docker). | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 7 — Add the INTEGRATION suite (container boot + first happy-path test) | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** Append a sibling `describe('INTEGRATION — Testcontainers + Prisma + supertest', () => { ... })` block to `tests-ALJ.test.ts`. | ||
|
|
||
| Required structure: | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| import { PostgreSqlContainer, StartedPostgreSqlContainer } from '@testcontainers/postgresql'; | ||
| import { execSync } from 'child_process'; | ||
| import path from 'path'; | ||
|
|
||
| describe('INTEGRATION — Testcontainers + Prisma + supertest', () => { | ||
| let container: StartedPostgreSqlContainer; | ||
| let prisma: PrismaClient; | ||
| let app: any; // import lazily AFTER DATABASE_URL is set | ||
|
|
||
| beforeAll(async () => { | ||
| container = await new PostgreSqlContainer('postgres:latest') | ||
| .withUsername('postgres') | ||
| .withPassword('password') | ||
| .withDatabase('mydatabase') | ||
| .start(); | ||
|
|
||
| process.env.DATABASE_URL = container.getConnectionUri(); | ||
|
|
||
| execSync('npx prisma migrate deploy', { | ||
| cwd: path.resolve(__dirname, '../..'), // backend/ | ||
| env: { ...process.env, DATABASE_URL: process.env.DATABASE_URL }, | ||
| stdio: 'inherit', | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const { PrismaClient } = await import('@prisma/client'); | ||
| prisma = new PrismaClient({ datasources: { db: { url: process.env.DATABASE_URL } } }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Lazy-import the app AFTER env is set so any module-load Prisma client uses the container URL | ||
| ({ app } = await import('../index')); | ||
| }, 120_000); | ||
|
|
||
| afterAll(async () => { | ||
| await prisma?.$disconnect(); | ||
| await container?.stop(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| beforeEach(async () => { | ||
| const tables = await prisma.$queryRaw<Array<{ tablename: string }>>` | ||
| SELECT tablename FROM pg_tables | ||
| WHERE schemaname = 'public' AND tablename NOT LIKE '_prisma%'`; | ||
| if (tables.length) { | ||
| const list = tables.map(t => `"public"."${t.tablename}"`).join(', '); | ||
| await prisma.$executeRawUnsafe(`TRUNCATE TABLE ${list} RESTART IDENTITY CASCADE;`); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('POST /candidates creates a candidate with educations, workExperiences, and resume', async () => { | ||
| const res = await request(app).post('/candidates').send(validPayload()); | ||
| expect(res.status).toBe(201); | ||
|
|
||
| const rows = await prisma.candidate.findMany({ include: { /* match real schema field names */ } }); | ||
| expect(rows).toHaveLength(1); | ||
| // assert nested educations / workExperiences / resume rows exist & FK-link to candidate | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **Critical detail:** the `fs` (and possibly `multer`) mocks at the top of the file apply to integration tests too — that's intentional. The integration suite tests Express + Prisma + Postgres, **not** disk I/O. | ||
|
|
||
| **Critical detail 2:** if Step 1 reported that `prisma/migrations/` is empty, replace `prisma migrate deploy` with `npx prisma db push --skip-generate` and tell me. | ||
|
|
||
| Run `npm run test:integration` — the one happy-path test must pass. First run will pull the `postgres:latest` image (~100MB). | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 7 | ||
| - Show the new INTEGRATION block. | ||
| - Show `npm run test:integration` output (1/1 green). | ||
| - Report container boot time and total wall-clock time. | ||
| - If anything fails (image pull, migration, app import), **stop and ask** before working around it. | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 8 — Round out the INTEGRATION suite (≥ 7 more tests) | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** Add these tests to the integration block: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. POST /candidates twice with the **same email** → second is rejected (4xx); only **one** candidate row in DB | ||
| 2. POST /candidates with **invalid email** → 400; zero rows in DB | ||
| 3. POST /candidates with **empty `educations` and `workExperiences` arrays** → 201; one candidate row, zero education/workExperience rows | ||
| 4. **Repository-level test:** call the domain `Candidate` save method directly against the real Prisma → row appears, ids autoincrement | ||
| 5. **Cascade integrity:** delete the candidate row → educations / workExperiences / resume removed (only if schema has `onDelete: Cascade`; otherwise assert FK error on candidate delete) | ||
| 6. **Date handling:** ISO date strings in the request body are stored as proper `DateTime` columns (read back via Prisma, compare) | ||
| 7. **CV persistence:** payload's `cv: { filePath, fileType }` produces a linked resume row (filesystem mock means no real write) | ||
|
|
||
| Total integration test count should be **≥ 8**. Total file test count should be **≥ 22**. | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 8 | ||
| - Show the full final `tests-ALJ.test.ts` file. | ||
| - Show `npm run test:all` output: every test green, count ≥ 22. | ||
| - Show timing breakdown (unit suite vs integration suite). | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 9 — README addendum | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** Append this section to `backend/README.md` (create the file if it doesn't exist; do **not** modify the root `README.md`): | ||
|
|
||
| ````markdown | ||
| ## Running tests (ALJ) | ||
|
|
||
| The file `backend/src/tests/tests-ALJ.test.ts` contains both unit and integration suites. | ||
|
|
||
| - **Unit tests** are fully mocked (no Docker, no DB): | ||
| ```bash | ||
| cd backend && npm run test:unit | ||
| ``` | ||
| - **Integration tests** spin up a disposable PostgreSQL via Testcontainers and run real Prisma migrations against it. Docker must be running: | ||
| ```bash | ||
| cd backend && npm run test:integration | ||
| ``` | ||
| - **Everything**: | ||
| ```bash | ||
| cd backend && npm run test:all | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| First integration run pulls the `postgres:latest` image (~100 MB). Subsequent runs reuse the cached image; container boot is ~3-5s. | ||
| ```` | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 9 | ||
| - Show the appended section. | ||
| - **Wait for `continue`.** | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # STEP 10 — Final acceptance run + summary | ||
|
|
||
| **Action:** Run all of these in order and report results: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. `cd backend && npm run test:unit` — must pass with Docker stopped | ||
| 2. Start Docker, then `npm run test:integration` — must pass | ||
| 3. `npm run test:all` — must pass | ||
| 4. `git status` — list every file you created or modified | ||
| 5. `git diff --stat` — show line-count changes per file | ||
|
|
||
| Then write a final summary covering: | ||
| - Total tests (unit / integration / total) | ||
| - Total wall-clock time for `test:all` | ||
| - Files created | ||
| - Files modified (should only be `package.json`, `package-lock.json`, the README, and **at most** `index.ts`) | ||
| - Any deviations from this plan and why | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 10 — FINAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Normalize checkpoint heading levels to fix markdownlint MD001 warnings.
At Line 72 and the later checkpoint headings, ### skips a level right after # STEP .... This triggers heading-increment warnings repeatedly.
Suggested heading-level fix
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 1
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 1
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 2
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 2
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 3
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 3
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 4
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 4
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 5
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 5
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 6
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 6
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 7
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 7
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 8
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 8
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 9
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 9
...
-### 🛑 CHECKPOINT 10 — FINAL
+## 🛑 CHECKPOINT 10 — FINAL🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 72-72: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 94-94: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 135-135: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 155-155: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 212-212: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 248-248: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 326-326: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 349-349: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 382-382: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
[warning] 405-405: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@test-plan-ALJ.md` around lines 72 - 405, The MD001 warnings are caused by the
"🛑 CHECKPOINT" headings using ### directly after a top-level "# STEP ..."
header; update each "### 🛑 CHECKPOINT ..." to be one level deeper than its
preceding STEP header (e.g., use "## 🛑 CHECKPOINT ..." when it immediately
follows a "# STEP ..." block) so heading levels increment by one consistently;
locate each occurrence of the "STEP" headers and the adjacent "🛑 CHECKPOINT"
headings in the document (symbols: "STEP" and "🛑 CHECKPOINT") and change the
checkpoint headings' hashes to ensure proper nesting and uniform heading levels
throughout the file.
|
Muy buen nivel técnico 👏 Se nota dominio de testing, tooling y separación de responsabilidades. Puntos fuertes
A mejorar
💡 Para ejercicios con rúbrica cerrada, intenta priorizar:
La calidad técnica está ahí; ahora toca optimizar foco y cumplimiento. |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Documentation
Chores