Skip to content

test(rate-limit): verify massive data sets and extreme high bounds scaling #4398#5742

Merged
JhaSourav07 merged 3 commits into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
Rakshak05:issue-#4398
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(rate-limit): verify massive data sets and extreme high bounds scaling #4398#5742
JhaSourav07 merged 3 commits into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
Rakshak05:issue-#4398

Conversation

@Rakshak05

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #4398

Description

This PR adds isolated unit and integration testing targeting Massive Data Sets and Extreme High Bounds Scaling for the rate-limiting utility (lib/rate-limit.ts).

Specifically, it implements the following 5 test cases in the new file lib/rate-limit.massive-scaling.test.ts:

  1. Thousands of unique IPs test: Verifies that 5,000 unique IPs are handled without memory overflow or degradation.
  2. Extreme limit bounds test: Verifies that a high limit value of 10,000 requests from a single IP is correctly exhausted sequentially.
  3. Massive concurrent unique IPs test: Verifies structure integrity of 100,000 unique contributor IP results using sampled assertions.
  4. SVG coordinate / numeric bounds test: Assures reset timestamps remain within safe numeric boundaries under extreme window sizes (up to MAX_INT32).
  5. Grid/listing rendering test: Checks that success/failure distributions are preserved across 50,000 unique IPs when allowlist and blocklist are prepopulated.

Pillar

  • 🎨 Pillar 1 — New Theme Design
  • 📐 Pillar 2 — Geometric SVG Improvement
  • 🕐 Pillar 3 — Timezone Logic Optimization
  • 🛠️ Other (Bug fix, refactoring, docs, testing)

Visual Preview

N/A (Backend / Utility Tests)

Checklist before requesting a review:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
  • I have tested these changes locally (localhost:3000/api/streak?user=YOUR_USERNAME).
  • I have run npm run format and npm run lint locally and resolved all errors (CI will fail otherwise).
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits format (e.g., feat(themes): ..., fix(calculate): ...).
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits format.
  • I have started the repo.
  • I have made sure that i have only one commit to merge in this PR.
  • The SVG output matches the CommitPulse "premium quality" aesthetic standard (no raw elements, smooth animations, correct fonts).
  • (Recommended) I joined the CommitPulse Discord community for contributor discussions, mentorship, and faster PR support.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 15, 2026 07:08
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Rakshak05 is attempting to deploy a commit to the jhasourav07's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📦 Next.js Bundle Size Report (Gzipped Sizes)

✨ No significant bundle size changes detected.

📊 Summary of Totals

Category PR Size Base Size Difference
Total JS 3433.75 KB 3433.75 KB 0 B
Total CSS 258.05 KB 258.05 KB 0 B

@Aamod007 Aamod007 added level:intermediate Moderate complexity tasks quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:testing Adding, updating, or fixing tests type:performance Code changes that improve performance/speed mentor:Aamod007 labels Jun 15, 2026

@Aamod007 Aamod007 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test suite is in good shape, but the PR is blocked by the Vercel status check waiting on deploy authorization. Please authorize the Vercel deployment and rerun the checks; once that is green, the scaling coverage in lib/rate-limit.massive-scaling.test.ts can be merged cleanly.

@Aamod007 Aamod007 added the gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points label Jun 15, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the GSSoC 2026 milestone Jun 15, 2026

@Aamod007 Aamod007 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice focused scaling coverage for the rate limiter. lib/rate-limit.massive-scaling.test.ts exercises the high-volume IP paths, the large request limit exhaustion path, and the reset-bound math without changing production code, so this is good to merge.

@JhaSourav07 JhaSourav07 merged commit fb7e7e4 into JhaSourav07:main Jun 15, 2026
11 of 12 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 Congratulations @Rakshak05! Your PR has been successfully merged. 🚀

Thank you for contributing to CommitPulse. Your work helps us build a better tool for the community.

⚠️ Important for GSSoC Contributors:
You are strictly advised to join our Discord Server as it is mandatory for all GSSoC participants. All important announcements, point claims, and community discussions happen there.

Keep building! 💻✨

@Rakshak05 Rakshak05 deleted the issue-#4398 branch June 16, 2026 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points level:intermediate Moderate complexity tasks mentor:Aamod007 quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:performance Code changes that improve performance/speed type:testing Adding, updating, or fixing tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test(rate-limit-massive-scaling): verify Massive Data Sets and Extreme High Bounds Scaling (Variation 2)

4 participants