Coverage guided mutation fuzzing and mutation agnostic tests#5571
Open
ealmloff wants to merge 63 commits into
Open
Coverage guided mutation fuzzing and mutation agnostic tests#5571ealmloff wants to merge 63 commits into
ealmloff wants to merge 63 commits into
Conversation
ealmloff
commented
May 21, 2026
ealmloff
commented
May 21, 2026
ealmloff
commented
May 22, 2026
ealmloff
commented
May 22, 2026
`test -x` on the rustup path failed on the warp runner because `llvm-tools-preview` does not always drop `llvm-symbolizer` at the expected location. Try the rustup path first, fall back to whatever the runner has on PATH, then to a versioned `/usr/bin/llvm-symbolizer-*`. Without a symbolizer LSan reports unsymbolicated frames and the leak: suppressions silently match nothing.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While working on #5554, most of the tests need to be rewritten and they don't cover a lot of cases we care about. This PR makes them more resilient by:
This is pulled out of #5554 to shrink the diff and separate out the bugs the proptesting finds from the placeholder removal
Bug fixes
div { width: "static", width: (i > 0).then("dynamic") })Performance
Comparison vs main on the js-framework-benchmark overhead (take results with a grain of salt. some of this could be system noise):
Manual testing
I manually tested this branch with dioxus-code, dioxus-components, and the suspense examples
TODO