Sensitivity / Bayesian assurance #669
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just noting that we have at least one sensitivity parameter implemented in the IV model. Because the IV model is formulated in a Bayesian way we have to use a joint distribution of treatment and outcome. In the binary case we have: CausalPy/causalpy/pymc_models.py Line 786 in a67408a In the continuous case it is just the correlation coefficient in the latent covariance: CausalPy/causalpy/pymc_models.py Line 825 in a67408a In both cases you can use az.pair_plot(idata, var_names=['rho', 'beta_z'])) to plot the relationship between the sensitivity parameter . This correlation is a proxy for the degree of unmeasured confounding. Other references i was thinking of is : This is very nice, but additionally we could look at applied missing data analysis.
This emphasises that the imputation view of causal inference is sensitive to the imputation scheme and generally ties causal inference and missing data view together |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.



Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi @juanitorduz @cetagostini @NathanielF @ErikRingen. On our list of TODO's was to kick off a discussion about the general topic of sensitivity analysis / Bayesian assurance.
Can we start by dropping in any thoughts, ideas, references to papers?
Ideally this will lead to crystallised ideas that people can turn into issues. Once we've got some issues going then I'll create a project board, but there seems little point right now.
Relevant existing issues, which we may want to build upon or replace:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions