God post: soften EuARe 2026 reference — drop Rome/date/session specifics

pmmathias · pmmathias · commit 3cdfd37f6360 · 2026-06-04T10:24:39.000+02:00
No longer attending in person / presenting in Rome, so the concrete event
details are removed across gott.html, en/god.html and both index post
cards: "in Rome", "2 July 2026", "Session 155" dropped; "Pre-Conference
Draft" relabeled "Working Paper". The paper remains accurately described
as accepted for EuARe 2026 (acceptance stands regardless of attendance).
diff --git a/en/god.html b/en/god.html
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ <h1 class="text-3xl sm:text-4xl font-bold mb-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-amber-400 v
     God as an Emergent Phenomenon
   </h1>
   <p class="text-gray-400 max-w-2xl text-base sm:text-lg leading-relaxed mb-6">
-    This post presents a formal theory of coherence in which a value space, a world matrix, and a valuation dynamics are defined over five axioms. From these axioms, six theorems are proven, including the NP-hardness of coherence maximization (Theorem&nbsp;3) and the existence of multiple stable end states for at least four entities (Theorem&nbsp;4). On this basis, a relational concept of God is described, as found in Whitehead and Spinoza. The paper has been accepted for the European Academy of Religion 2026 in Rome. Six chapters with interactive visualizations.
+    This post presents a formal theory of coherence in which a value space, a world matrix, and a valuation dynamics are defined over five axioms. From these axioms, six theorems are proven, including the NP-hardness of coherence maximization (Theorem&nbsp;3) and the existence of multiple stable end states for at least four entities (Theorem&nbsp;4). On this basis, a relational concept of God is described, as found in Whitehead and Spinoza. The paper has been accepted for the European Academy of Religion 2026. Six chapters with interactive visualizations.
   </p>
   <div class="flex items-center gap-3 text-xs text-gray-500">
     <span>KI-Mathias</span>
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ <h2>From Emergence to Meaning</h2>
 
 <p>This work attempts an answer. Not in the form of a sermon and not in the form of a refutation, but as a philosophical experiment on a formal foundation.</p>
 
-<p>The background of this post is an academic paper that emerged in February 2026: <em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em>. It has been accepted for the Philosophy of Religion panel of the <strong>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</strong> in Rome, presented on 2 July 2026.<sup class="footnote-ref" id="fnref-paper">[1]</sup> Formal peer review by the academic community is pending. Concretely: the mathematics presented below may hold &ndash; or it may collapse under further peer review. What is described below is what the mathematics <em>might</em> mean; not what it definitively shows.</p>
+<p>The background of this post is an academic paper that emerged in February 2026: <em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em>. It has been accepted for the Philosophy of Religion panel of the <strong>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</strong>.<sup class="footnote-ref" id="fnref-paper">[1]</sup> Formal peer review by the academic community is pending. Concretely: the mathematics presented below may hold &ndash; or it may collapse under further peer review. What is described below is what the mathematics <em>might</em> mean; not what it definitively shows.</p>
 
 <!-- Paper download box -->
 <div style="margin: 2rem 0; padding: 1.25rem 1.5rem; border: 1px solid rgba(251, 191, 36, 0.35); border-radius: 0.5rem; background: linear-gradient(135deg, rgba(251, 191, 36, 0.06), rgba(167, 139, 250, 0.04));">
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ <h2>From Emergence to Meaning</h2>
     </svg>
     <div style="flex:1; min-width: 240px;">
       <p style="margin:0 0 0.35rem 0; color:#fbbf24; font-weight:600; font-size:0.95rem;">Read the full paper</p>
-      <p style="margin:0 0 0.6rem 0; color:#d1d5db; font-size:0.9rem; line-height:1.55;"><em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em> &mdash; Leonhardt (2026). Working Paper, Version 8 (May 2026), English, ~656 KB. Accepted for EuARe 2026, Rome &mdash; Philosophy of Religion panel (Session 155, 2 July 2026). <span style="color:#fbbf24;">Pre-conference draft &mdash; not yet peer-reviewed, revisions may follow.</span></p>
+      <p style="margin:0 0 0.6rem 0; color:#d1d5db; font-size:0.9rem; line-height:1.55;"><em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em> &mdash; Leonhardt (2026). Working Paper, Version 8 (May 2026), English, ~656 KB. Accepted for the Philosophy of Religion panel of EuARe 2026. <span style="color:#fbbf24;">Working paper &mdash; not yet peer-reviewed, revisions may follow.</span></p>
       <a href="/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf" download style="display:inline-block; padding:0.5rem 1rem; background:rgba(251,191,36,0.15); border:1px solid rgba(251,191,36,0.5); border-radius:0.375rem; color:#fbbf24; text-decoration:none; font-weight:500; font-size:0.9rem;">Download PDF &rarr;</a>
     </div>
   </div>
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ <h2>The Honest Caveat</h2>
 <h3 style="margin-top:0;">References</h3>
 
 <ol>
-  <li id="fn-1">Leonhardt, M. (2026). &ldquo;<a href="/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf">From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</a>&rdquo;. Accepted for presentation at <em>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</em>, Philosophy of Religion panel, Rome, 2 July 2026 (Session 155, paper ID 1395). Working Paper v8 (May 2026).</li>
+  <li id="fn-1">Leonhardt, M. (2026). &ldquo;<a href="/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf">From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</a>&rdquo;. Accepted for the Philosophy of Religion panel of the <em>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</em> (paper ID 1395). Working Paper v8 (May 2026).</li>
   <li id="fn-2">Spinoza, B. (1677). <em>Ethica, ordine geometrico demonstrata</em>. In particular Part I: &ldquo;De Deo&rdquo;.</li>
   <li id="fn-3">Whitehead, A. N. (1929). <em>Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology</em>. Macmillan. In particular Part V: &ldquo;Final Interpretation&rdquo;.</li>
   <li id="fn-4">Plato (ca. 380 BCE). <em>Protagoras</em>. The thesis that no one does wrong willingly is also found in <em>Gorgias</em> and <em>Meno</em>.</li>
diff --git a/en/index.html b/en/index.html
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ <h3 class="text-xl sm:text-2xl font-bold text-white group-hover:text-amber-400 t
           God as an Emergent Phenomenon
         </h3>
         <p class="text-gray-400 text-sm leading-relaxed mb-3">
-          What emerges from enough human thought? A concept of God beyond religion &ndash; formalized, not proven. Six chapters, six interactive visualizations. Based on a paper submitted to the European Academy of Religion 2026 in Rome.
+          What emerges from enough human thought? A concept of God beyond religion &ndash; formalized, not proven. Six chapters, six interactive visualizations. Based on a paper submitted to the European Academy of Religion 2026.
         </p>
         <div class="flex items-center gap-3 text-xs text-gray-500">
           <time datetime="2026-03-25">March 25, 2026</time>
diff --git a/gott.html b/gott.html
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ <h1 class="text-3xl sm:text-4xl font-bold mb-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-amber-400 v
     Gott als Emergenzph&auml;nomen
   </h1>
   <p class="text-gray-400 max-w-2xl text-base sm:text-lg leading-relaxed mb-6">
-    Inhalt dieses Beitrags ist eine formale Theorie der Koh&auml;renz, in der ein Werteraum, eine Welt-Matrix und eine Bewertungs-Dynamik &uuml;ber f&uuml;nf Axiomen definiert werden. Aus diesen Axiomen werden sechs Theoreme bewiesen, darunter die NP-H&auml;rte der Koh&auml;renz-Maximierung (Theorem&nbsp;3) und die Existenz mehrerer stabiler Endzust&auml;nde ab vier Entit&auml;ten (Theorem&nbsp;4). Auf dieser Grundlage wird ein relationaler Gottesbegriff beschrieben, wie er bei Whitehead und Spinoza vorliegt. Das Paper ist f&uuml;r die European Academy of Religion 2026 in Rom angenommen. Sechs Kapitel mit interaktiven Visualisierungen.
+    Inhalt dieses Beitrags ist eine formale Theorie der Koh&auml;renz, in der ein Werteraum, eine Welt-Matrix und eine Bewertungs-Dynamik &uuml;ber f&uuml;nf Axiomen definiert werden. Aus diesen Axiomen werden sechs Theoreme bewiesen, darunter die NP-H&auml;rte der Koh&auml;renz-Maximierung (Theorem&nbsp;3) und die Existenz mehrerer stabiler Endzust&auml;nde ab vier Entit&auml;ten (Theorem&nbsp;4). Auf dieser Grundlage wird ein relationaler Gottesbegriff beschrieben, wie er bei Whitehead und Spinoza vorliegt. Das Paper ist f&uuml;r die European Academy of Religion 2026 angenommen. Sechs Kapitel mit interaktiven Visualisierungen.
   </p>
   <div class="flex items-center gap-3 text-xs text-gray-500">
     <span>KI-Mathias</span>
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ <h2>Von der Emergenz zur Bedeutung</h2>
 
 <p>Diese Arbeit versucht eine Antwort. Nicht in Form einer Predigt und nicht in Form einer Widerlegung, sondern als philosophisches Experiment auf formaler Grundlage.</p>
 
-<p>Hintergrund dieses Beitrags ist ein akademisches Paper, das im Februar 2026 entstand: <em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em>. Es wurde f&uuml;r das Philosophy-of-Religion-Panel der <strong>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</strong> in Rom angenommen und wird am 2. Juli 2026 vorgetragen.<sup class="footnote-ref" id="fnref-paper">[1]</sup> Die formale Peer-Begutachtung durch die wissenschaftliche Community steht aus. Dies bedeutet konkret: Die im Folgenden dargestellte Mathematik k&ouml;nnte tragen &ndash; oder sie k&ouml;nnte unter weiterem Peer-Review zusammenbrechen. Beschrieben wird im Folgenden, was die Mathematik bedeuten <em>k&ouml;nnte</em>; nicht, was sie abschlie&szlig;end zeigt.</p>
+<p>Hintergrund dieses Beitrags ist ein akademisches Paper, das im Februar 2026 entstand: <em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em>. Es wurde f&uuml;r das Philosophy-of-Religion-Panel der <strong>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</strong> angenommen.<sup class="footnote-ref" id="fnref-paper">[1]</sup> Die formale Peer-Begutachtung durch die wissenschaftliche Community steht aus. Dies bedeutet konkret: Die im Folgenden dargestellte Mathematik k&ouml;nnte tragen &ndash; oder sie k&ouml;nnte unter weiterem Peer-Review zusammenbrechen. Beschrieben wird im Folgenden, was die Mathematik bedeuten <em>k&ouml;nnte</em>; nicht, was sie abschlie&szlig;end zeigt.</p>
 
 <!-- Paper download box -->
 <div style="margin: 2rem 0; padding: 1.25rem 1.5rem; border: 1px solid rgba(251, 191, 36, 0.35); border-radius: 0.5rem; background: linear-gradient(135deg, rgba(251, 191, 36, 0.06), rgba(167, 139, 250, 0.04));">
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ <h2>Von der Emergenz zur Bedeutung</h2>
     </svg>
     <div style="flex:1; min-width: 240px;">
       <p style="margin:0 0 0.35rem 0; color:#fbbf24; font-weight:600; font-size:0.95rem;">Das vollst&auml;ndige Paper lesen</p>
-      <p style="margin:0 0 0.6rem 0; color:#d1d5db; font-size:0.9rem; line-height:1.55;"><em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em> &mdash; Leonhardt (2026). Working Paper, Version 8 (Mai 2026), Englisch, ~656 KB. Angenommen f&uuml;r die <strong>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</strong>, Philosophy-of-Religion-Panel, Rom, 2. Juli 2026 (Session 155). <span style="color:#fbbf24;">Pre-Conference-Draft &mdash; noch nicht peer-reviewed, Revisionen m&ouml;glich.</span></p>
+      <p style="margin:0 0 0.6rem 0; color:#d1d5db; font-size:0.9rem; line-height:1.55;"><em>From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology</em> &mdash; Leonhardt (2026). Working Paper, Version 8 (Mai 2026), Englisch, ~656 KB. Angenommen f&uuml;r das Philosophy-of-Religion-Panel der <strong>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</strong>. <span style="color:#fbbf24;">Working Paper &mdash; noch nicht peer-reviewed, Revisionen m&ouml;glich.</span></p>
       <a href="/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf" download style="display:inline-block; padding:0.5rem 1rem; background:rgba(251,191,36,0.15); border:1px solid rgba(251,191,36,0.5); border-radius:0.375rem; color:#fbbf24; text-decoration:none; font-weight:500; font-size:0.9rem;">PDF herunterladen &rarr;</a>
     </div>
   </div>
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ <h2>Die ehrliche Einschr&auml;nkung</h2>
 <h3 style="margin-top:0;">Quellen</h3>
 
 <ol>
-  <li id="fn-1">Leonhardt, M. (2026). &bdquo;From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology&ldquo;. Angenommen f&uuml;r das Philosophy-of-Religion-Panel der <em>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</em>, Rom, 2. Juli 2026. Working Paper v8 (Mai 2026) verf&uuml;gbar unter <a href="/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf">/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf</a>.</li>
+  <li id="fn-1">Leonhardt, M. (2026). &bdquo;From Coherence to Consequent Nature: A Formal Approach to Process-Relational Theology&ldquo;. Angenommen f&uuml;r das Philosophy-of-Religion-Panel der <em>European Academy of Religion (EuARe) 2026</em>. Working Paper v8 (Mai 2026) verf&uuml;gbar unter <a href="/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf">/papers/coherence-formal-v8.pdf</a>.</li>
   <li id="fn-2">Spinoza, B. (1677). <em>Ethica, ordine geometrico demonstrata</em>. Insbesondere Teil I: &bdquo;De Deo&ldquo;.</li>
   <li id="fn-3">Whitehead, A. N. (1929). <em>Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology</em>. Macmillan. Insbesondere Teil V: &bdquo;Final Interpretation&ldquo;.</li>
   <li id="fn-4">Platon (ca. 380 v. Chr.). <em>Protagoras</em>. Die These, dass niemand freiwillig Unrecht tut, findet sich auch in <em>Gorgias</em> und <em>Menon</em>.</li>
diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ <h3 class="text-xl sm:text-2xl font-bold text-white group-hover:text-amber-400 t
           Gott als Emergenzph&auml;nomen
         </h3>
         <p class="text-gray-400 text-sm leading-relaxed mb-3">
-          Was emergiert aus genug menschlichen Gedanken? &Uuml;ber einen Gottesbegriff jenseits der Religion &ndash; formalisiert, nicht bewiesen. Sechs Kapitel, sechs interaktive Visualisierungen. Basierend auf einem Paper, das bei der European Academy of Religion 2026 in Rom eingereicht wurde.
+          Was emergiert aus genug menschlichen Gedanken? &Uuml;ber einen Gottesbegriff jenseits der Religion &ndash; formalisiert, nicht bewiesen. Sechs Kapitel, sechs interaktive Visualisierungen. Basierend auf einem Paper, das bei der European Academy of Religion 2026 eingereicht wurde.
         </p>
         <div class="flex items-center gap-3 text-xs text-gray-500">
           <time datetime="2026-03-25">25. M&auml;rz 2026</time>
