Should dimensions (description: Edge/face dimensions of the prism) be linked to mathematicalShapes ?
Should the type of orientation (description: Orientation of reflective face vs cortical layers) be a string or defined as Controlled terms? Same question for edgePolishQuality.
NB: List of microprism properties:
| Field |
Description |
Required |
Type |
material |
Add microprism optical material |
Optional |
linked -> chemicalMixture |
dimensions |
Edge/face dimensions of the prism |
Yes |
Linked -> |
prismAngleDeg |
Apex or right angle spec |
Yes |
QuantitativeValue |
orientation |
Orientation of reflective face vs cortical layers |
Yes |
string? |
distanceFromSurface |
Distance between prism face and pial surface (move to device implantion) |
Optional |
QuantitativeValue |
tissueReliefCuts |
Whether relief cuts were made (make better Description) |
Optional |
boolean |
edgePolishQuality |
Quality spec of polished edges |
Optional |
string or controled term |
edgePolishQuality:
- unpolished
cut edge only, not smoothed.
- standard
edges ground smooth, acceptable for most in vivo use.
- opticalPolish
high-quality polish, low scatter, edges suitable for imaging.
- superPolish
extremely smooth surface (<50 nm roughness).
Should
dimensions(description: Edge/face dimensions of the prism) be linked tomathematicalShapes?Should the type of
orientation(description: Orientation of reflective face vs cortical layers) be astringor defined asControlled terms? Same question for edgePolishQuality.NB: List of microprism properties:
materialchemicalMixturedimensionsprismAngleDegQuantitativeValueorientationdistanceFromSurfaceQuantitativeValuetissueReliefCutsedgePolishQualityedgePolishQuality: