|
| 1 | +import Test |
| 2 | +import BlockchainHelpers |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +import "FlowALPv0" |
| 5 | +import "MOET" |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +import "test_helpers.cdc" |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +access(all) var snapshot: UInt64 = 0 |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +access(all) |
| 12 | +fun safeReset() { |
| 13 | + let cur = getCurrentBlockHeight() |
| 14 | + if cur > snapshot { |
| 15 | + Test.reset(to: snapshot) |
| 16 | + } |
| 17 | +} |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +access(all) |
| 20 | +fun setup() { |
| 21 | + deployContracts() |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + setMockOraclePrice(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, forTokenIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, price: 1.0) |
| 24 | + createAndStorePool(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, defaultTokenIdentifier: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, beFailed: false) |
| 25 | + addSupportedTokenZeroRateCurve( |
| 26 | + signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, |
| 27 | + tokenTypeIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 28 | + collateralFactor: 0.8, |
| 29 | + borrowFactor: 1.0, |
| 30 | + depositRate: 1_000_000.0, |
| 31 | + depositCapacityCap: 1_000_000.0 |
| 32 | + ) |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | + // DEX swapper for FLOW → MOET (price 1:1, matches oracle) |
| 35 | + setMockDexPriceForPair( |
| 36 | + signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, |
| 37 | + inVaultIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 38 | + outVaultIdentifier: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 39 | + vaultSourceStoragePath: MOET.VaultStoragePath, |
| 40 | + priceRatio: 1.0 |
| 41 | + ) |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + snapshot = getCurrentBlockHeight() |
| 44 | +} |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 47 | +/// Malicious topUpSource leads to liquidation |
| 48 | +/// |
| 49 | +/// Simulates a topUpSource that provides no funds, preventing rebalancing |
| 50 | +/// after the position becomes undercollateralized. The position |
| 51 | +/// remains liquidatable and is successfully liquidated. |
| 52 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 53 | +access(all) |
| 54 | +fun testRebalance_MaliciousTopUpSource_EnablesLiquidation() { |
| 55 | + safeReset() |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + let user = Test.createAccount() |
| 58 | + setupMoetVault(user, beFailed: false) |
| 59 | + let mintRes = mintFlow(to: user, amount: 1_000.0) |
| 60 | + Test.expect(mintRes, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 61 | + createPosition(admin: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, signer: user, amount: 1_000.0, vaultStoragePath: FLOW_VAULT_STORAGE_PATH, pushToDrawDownSink: true) |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + // completely empty the topUpSource so that any withdrawal returns 0 |
| 64 | + let drain = Test.createAccount() |
| 65 | + setupMoetVault(drain, beFailed: false) |
| 66 | + let userMoet = getBalance(address: user.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 67 | + transferFungibleTokens( |
| 68 | + tokenIdentifier: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 69 | + from: user, |
| 70 | + to: drain, |
| 71 | + amount: userMoet // all amount |
| 72 | + ) |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + // crash price so health falls below 1.0 |
| 75 | + let crashPrice = 0.5 |
| 76 | + setMockOraclePrice(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, forTokenIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, price: crashPrice) |
| 77 | + setMockDexPriceForPair( |
| 78 | + signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, |
| 79 | + inVaultIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 80 | + outVaultIdentifier: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 81 | + vaultSourceStoragePath: MOET.VaultStoragePath, |
| 82 | + priceRatio: crashPrice |
| 83 | + ) |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + Test.assert(getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) < 1.0, message: "Position must be liquidatable after price crash") |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + // rebalance attempt should fail cause source has 0 MOET |
| 88 | + let rebalanceRes = rebalancePosition(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, pid: 0, force: true) |
| 89 | + Test.expect(rebalanceRes, Test.beFailed()) |
| 90 | + Test.assertError(rebalanceRes, errorMessage: "topUpSource insufficient to save position from liquidation") |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + // position is still liquidatable |
| 93 | + Test.assert(getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) < 1.0,message: "Position should remain liquidatable after failed rebalance",) |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + let liquidator = Test.createAccount() |
| 96 | + setupMoetVault(liquidator, beFailed: false) |
| 97 | + mintMoet(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, to: liquidator.address, amount: 1_000.0, beFailed: false) |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + let repayAmount = 100.0 |
| 100 | + let seizeAmount = 150.0 |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | + let collateralPreLiq = getPositionBalance(pid: 0, vaultID: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER).balance |
| 103 | + let debtPreLiq = getPositionBalance(pid: 0, vaultID: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER).balance |
| 104 | + let liqMoetBefore = getBalance(address: liquidator.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | + let liqRes = manualLiquidation( |
| 107 | + signer: liquidator, |
| 108 | + pid: 0, |
| 109 | + debtVaultIdentifier: Type<@MOET.Vault>().identifier, |
| 110 | + seizeVaultIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, |
| 111 | + seizeAmount: seizeAmount, |
| 112 | + repayAmount: repayAmount |
| 113 | + ) |
| 114 | + Test.expect(liqRes, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + // position lost exactly the liquidated amounts |
| 117 | + let collateralPostLiq = getPositionBalance(pid: 0, vaultID: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER).balance |
| 118 | + let debtPostLiq = getPositionBalance(pid: 0, vaultID: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER).balance |
| 119 | + Test.assertEqual(collateralPostLiq, collateralPreLiq - seizeAmount) |
| 120 | + Test.assertEqual(debtPostLiq, debtPreLiq - repayAmount) |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | + // liquidator spent MOET and received FLOW |
| 123 | + let liqMoetAfter = getBalance(address: liquidator.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 124 | + let liqFlowAfter = getBalance(address: liquidator.address, vaultPublicPath: /public/flowTokenBalance)! |
| 125 | + Test.assertEqual(liqMoetBefore - liqMoetAfter, repayAmount) |
| 126 | + Test.assertEqual(liqFlowAfter, seizeAmount) |
| 127 | +} |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 130 | +/// Rebalance skipped due to DrawDownSink rejection |
| 131 | +/// |
| 132 | +/// Simulates an overcollateralised position where rebalance attempts |
| 133 | +/// to push surplus funds to the drawDownSink, but the sink cannot |
| 134 | +/// accept cause was removed |
| 135 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 136 | +access(all) |
| 137 | +fun testRebalance_DrawDownSinkRejection() { |
| 138 | + safeReset() |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + let user = Test.createAccount() |
| 141 | + setupMoetVault(user, beFailed: false) |
| 142 | + transferFlowTokens(to: user, amount: 1_000.0) |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | + createPosition( |
| 145 | + admin: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, |
| 146 | + signer: user, |
| 147 | + amount: 1_000.0, |
| 148 | + vaultStoragePath: FLOW_VAULT_STORAGE_PATH, |
| 149 | + pushToDrawDownSink: true |
| 150 | + ) |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + let initialDebt = getPositionBalance(pid: 0, vaultID: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER).balance |
| 153 | + let healthBeforePriceChange = getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | + setMockOraclePrice(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, forTokenIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, price: 1.5) |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | + // price increase, position even more overcollateralised |
| 158 | + let healthAfterPrice = getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) |
| 159 | + Test.assert(healthAfterPrice >= INT_MAX_HEALTH, message: "Position should be overcollateralized after price increase, health=\(healthAfterPrice.toString())") |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | + let moetInVaultBeforeRebalance = getBalance(address: user.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | + // remove the drawDownSink, so rebalance cannot push surplus to drawDownSink |
| 164 | + let setSinkRes = setDrawDownSink(signer: user, pid: 0, sink: nil) |
| 165 | + Test.expect(setSinkRes, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | + let rebalanceRes = rebalancePosition(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, pid: 0, force: true) |
| 168 | + Test.expect(rebalanceRes, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | + let healthAfterRebalance = getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) |
| 171 | + let moetInVaultAfterRebalance = getBalance(address: user.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | + // debt and health stay the same |
| 174 | + Test.assertEqual(moetInVaultAfterRebalance, moetInVaultBeforeRebalance) |
| 175 | + let debtAfterRebalance = getPositionBalance(pid: 0, vaultID: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER).balance |
| 176 | + Test.assertEqual(initialDebt, debtAfterRebalance) |
| 177 | + Test.assert(healthAfterRebalance >= INT_TARGET_HEALTH, message: "Health should remain above targetHealth when sink is removed (health=\(healthAfterRebalance.toString()))") |
| 178 | + Test.assertEqual(healthAfterRebalance, healthAfterPrice) |
| 179 | +} |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 182 | +/// Rebalance exceeds gas limits for large position set |
| 183 | +/// |
| 184 | +/// Simulates many overcollateralised positions requiring rebalance. |
| 185 | +/// Since asyncUpdate processes a limited batch per call, attempting |
| 186 | +/// to handle too many positions in one transaction exceeds the |
| 187 | +/// computation limit and fails. |
| 188 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 189 | +access(all) |
| 190 | +fun testRebalance_AsyncUpdate_ProcessesAtMostConfiguredBatchSize() { |
| 191 | + safeReset() |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | + // open positions so they land in the update queue |
| 194 | + let numPositions = 150 |
| 195 | + var pid: UInt64 = 0 |
| 196 | + while pid < UInt64(numPositions) { |
| 197 | + let user = Test.createAccount() |
| 198 | + setupMoetVault(user, beFailed: false) |
| 199 | + let mintRes = mintFlow(to: user, amount: 1_000.0) |
| 200 | + Test.expect(mintRes, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 201 | + createPosition( |
| 202 | + admin: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, |
| 203 | + signer: user, |
| 204 | + amount: 1_000.0, |
| 205 | + vaultStoragePath: FLOW_VAULT_STORAGE_PATH, |
| 206 | + pushToDrawDownSink: true |
| 207 | + ) |
| 208 | + pid = pid + 1 |
| 209 | + } |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | + // raise price: all positions overcollateralised |
| 212 | + // effectiveCollateral = 1000 × 1.2 × 0.8 = 960 |
| 213 | + // effectiveDebt ≈ 615.38 |
| 214 | + // health ≈ 1.56 > maxHealth (1.5) |
| 215 | + setMockOraclePrice(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, forTokenIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, price: 1.2) |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | + // try to asyncUpdate for rebalancing positions back toward targetHealth (1.3) |
| 218 | + let asyncUpdateRes = asyncUpdate() |
| 219 | + Test.expect(asyncUpdateRes, Test.beFailed()) |
| 220 | + Test.assertError(asyncUpdateRes, errorMessage: "computation exceeds limit") |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | + // all positions should have not been processed |
| 223 | + var i: UInt64 = 0 |
| 224 | + while i < UInt64(numPositions) { |
| 225 | + let h = getPositionHealth(pid: i, beFailed: false) |
| 226 | + Test.assert(h > INT_MAX_HEALTH, message: "Position \(i.toString()) should be overcollateralised") |
| 227 | + i = i + 1 |
| 228 | + } |
| 229 | +} |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 232 | +/// Shared liquidity source across positions |
| 233 | +/// |
| 234 | +/// Two positions share the same topUpSource. After a price drop, only one can |
| 235 | +/// be rebalanced due to limited funds; the first succeeds, the second fails |
| 236 | +/// and remains liquidatable. |
| 237 | +/// ============================================================ |
| 238 | +access(all) |
| 239 | +fun testRebalance_ConcurrentRebalances() { |
| 240 | + safeReset() |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | + let user = Test.createAccount() |
| 243 | + let drain = Test.createAccount() |
| 244 | + |
| 245 | + setupMoetVault(user, beFailed: false) |
| 246 | + setupMoetVault(drain, beFailed: false) |
| 247 | + |
| 248 | + var mintRes = mintFlow(to: user, amount: 2_000.0) |
| 249 | + Test.expect(mintRes, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | + createPosition(admin: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, signer: user, amount: 1_000.0, vaultStoragePath: FLOW_VAULT_STORAGE_PATH, pushToDrawDownSink: true) |
| 252 | + createPosition(admin: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, signer: user, amount: 1_000.0, vaultStoragePath: FLOW_VAULT_STORAGE_PATH, pushToDrawDownSink: true) |
| 253 | + |
| 254 | + // minHealth = 1.1: required deposit per position to reach minHealth after 50% price crash: |
| 255 | + // effectiveCollateral = 1 000 * 0.5 * 0.8 = 400 |
| 256 | + // effectiveDebt ≈ 615.38461538 |
| 257 | + // |
| 258 | + // health >= 1.0 (to avoid liquidation): 400 / (615.38461538 - required) = 1.0 |
| 259 | + // Required MOET ≈ 215.38461538 MOET |
| 260 | + // |
| 261 | + // left 215.38 MOET which is enough for one position, not both |
| 262 | + let moetAmount = getBalance(address: user.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 263 | + transferFungibleTokens(tokenIdentifier: MOET_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, from: user, to: drain, amount: moetAmount - 215.38461538) |
| 264 | + |
| 265 | + // drop price so both positions fall below health 1.0 |
| 266 | + // effectiveCollateral = 1000 * 0.5 * 0.8 = 400; debt ≈ 615 → health ≈ 0.65 |
| 267 | + setMockOraclePrice(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, forTokenIdentifier: FLOW_TOKEN_IDENTIFIER, price: 0.5) |
| 268 | + |
| 269 | + Test.assert(getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) < 1.0, message: "Position should be undercollateralised") |
| 270 | + Test.assert(getPositionHealth(pid: 1, beFailed: false) < 1.0, message: "Position should be undercollateralised") |
| 271 | + let userMoetBefore = getBalance(address: user.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 272 | + |
| 273 | + // first rebalance (position 0): user has 215.38461538 MOET — enough to rescue |
| 274 | + let rebalanceRes0 = rebalancePosition(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, pid: 0, force: true) |
| 275 | + Test.expect(rebalanceRes0, Test.beSucceeded()) |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | + let userMoetAfterFirst = getBalance(address: user.address, vaultPublicPath: MOET.VaultPublicPath)! |
| 278 | + Test.assert( |
| 279 | + userMoetAfterFirst < userMoetBefore, |
| 280 | + message: "user's MOET should have decreased after first rebalance (before=\(userMoetBefore.toString()), after=\(userMoetAfterFirst.toString()))" |
| 281 | + ) |
| 282 | + |
| 283 | + let health0AfterFirst = getPositionHealth(pid: 0, beFailed: false) |
| 284 | + Test.assert( |
| 285 | + health0AfterFirst >= 1.0, |
| 286 | + message: "Position 0 should be healthy after first rebalance (health=\(health0AfterFirst.toString()))" |
| 287 | + ) |
| 288 | + |
| 289 | + // second rebalance (position 1): user has 0 MOET — not enough to rescue |
| 290 | + let rebalance1 = rebalancePosition(signer: PROTOCOL_ACCOUNT, pid: 1, force: true) |
| 291 | + Test.expect(rebalance1, Test.beFailed()) |
| 292 | + Test.assertError(rebalance1, errorMessage: "topUpSource insufficient to save position from liquidation") |
| 293 | + |
| 294 | + // position 1 remains undercollateralised and open for liquidation |
| 295 | + let health1AfterSecond = getPositionHealth(pid: 1, beFailed: false) |
| 296 | + Test.assert( |
| 297 | + health1AfterSecond < 1.0, |
| 298 | + message: "Position 1 should remain undercollateralised after failed second rebalance (health=\(health1AfterSecond.toString()))" |
| 299 | + ) |
| 300 | +} |
0 commit comments