handling whatsapp cloud extra 9 contact number#448
Open
rasoro wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #448 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.31% 72.30% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 95 95
Lines 12565 12582 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 9087 9097 +10
- Misses 2850 2855 +5
- Partials 628 630 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Contributor
|
I wondering if we really need to use this as now we can just send by phone number https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/cloud-api/reference/messages#message-object and soon no WA ID will be used at all even for on-prem https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/on-premises/reference/contacts Was the issue reproduced with WhatsApp Cloud before adding this PR? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is related to this #437 which was also discussed here #433