From 54f9f9a9e6c39a53217082644b01f8b7e2665de3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Artur Shiriev Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:03:58 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] docs: make planning/index.py noqa comment repo-neutral Backport of the upstream convention fix (lesnik512/planning-convention#2): the leading `# ruff: noqa` comment referenced faststream-outbox, another consumer of the convention. Reword it to explain the suppression generically. Comment-only, no behavior change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- planning/index.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/planning/index.py b/planning/index.py index a1632e1..f10f5e0 100644 --- a/planning/index.py +++ b/planning/index.py @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# ruff: noqa: INP001, D212 # planning/ is not a Python package; D212/D213 conflict differs from faststream-outbox +# ruff: noqa: INP001, D212 # planning/ is not a Python package; the module docstring uses the D213 (second-line summary) style, so D212 is suppressed """ Generate the planning index from frontmatter.