Skip to content

(?) support .fsx files (without .fsproj file) #17

Description

@jkone27

we can consider if it makes sense to load from .fsx instead of project file, so if fable con operate also just on .fsx files following dependencies, just as a possible extension. I think not seing a .fsproj file can make it easier for non dotnet devs maybe? wdyt

maybe something like

fable({ 
   fsproj: undefined, --> tries compile with fable using .fsx only 
  })

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions