OSDM Tech working group's stance on asynchronous fulfillment HTTP response code (202?)

[ManuelQuemerais]

We’re interested in OSDM Tech working group's stance on asynchronous fulfillment, and more specifically on HTTP response code.

• Should we use HTTP code 202 for asynchronous fulfillment (POST fulfillments) whenever successfully confirming the bookingParts and creating the fulfillments, considering that given lack of documents there’s still background processes that are required ?
• Or should we use HTTP code 200, considering that the asynchronous part is another process (document generation ….) and that the main resources of the operation (bookingParts, fulfillments) have been successfully updated/created ?