Skip to content

fix: MCP COS 工具发现与调用机制存在缺陷#662

Open
binggg wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mo8xdkmq-6owy7e-mcp-cos
Open

fix: MCP COS 工具发现与调用机制存在缺陷#662
binggg wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mo8xdkmq-6owy7e-mcp-cos

Conversation

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@binggg binggg commented Apr 28, 2026

Attribution issue

  • issueId: issue_mo8xdkmq_6owy7e
  • category: tool
  • canonicalTitle: MCP COS 工具发现与调用机制存在缺陷
  • representativeRun: atomic-js-cloudbase-chain-storage-upload-helloworld-and-poll/2026-04-21T17-55-35-ifqpo4

Automation summary

SUMMARY:
root_cause: ATTRIBUTION_MISMATCH. The issue title "MCP COS 工具发现与调用机制存在缺陷" does not accurately describe the actual failure.
The failed check shows: "internal evaluation artifact 不存在" with error "internal evaluation artifact 不存在" - the agent failed to produce any output because it returned a model API error "400 invalid parameter value" before any tool call was attempted.
The trace shows:

  1. User requested COS upload task via MCP tools
  2. Assistant immediately returned: "400 invalid parameter value (167a0f5cf0a856ff5e5cfb714e80c3c0/92557a2b-1965-48e4-9d99-b45a1fb615cc)"
  3. Zero tool calls were made
  4. Error source: [EXECUTION_ERROR] model API returned 400 error before any tool call
    This is a model-level request validation error, not a COS tool discovery or invocation defect. The model rejected the request entirely before attempting to invoke any tools. The canonical title implies a problem with COS tool discovery/invocation mechanisms in the MCP server code, but the actual failure is at the model API layer.
    changes: None - this is not a fixable product defect in the CloudBase-MCP repository.
    validation: N/A - no product code changes made.
    follow_up: ATTRIBUTION_MISMATCH:
    (a) Represe

Changed files

  • mcp/package-lock.json
  • mcp/package.json

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

binggg commented Apr 28, 2026

Attribution post-PR evaluation

  • visibility: internal identifiers, run ids, and private links are intentionally omitted
  • attempt: 1
  • eval_scope: primary_only
  • overall: FAILED
  • summary: at least one planned evaluation case failed
  • updated_at: 2026-04-28T22:27:10.763Z

Cases

  • [FAILED] — primary — evaluation failed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant