I'd like to suggest adding support for gmd:status.
ISO-19115:2003 definitions
gmd:status: status of the resource(s)
gmd:MD_ProgressCode: status of the dataset or progress of a review
Example
<gmd:identificationInfo>
<gmd:MD_DataIdentification>
<gmd:status>
<gmd:MD_ProgressCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#MD_ProgressCode" codeListValue="onGoing">
</gmd:MD_ProgressCode>
</gmd:status>
</gmd:MD_DataIdentification>
</gmd:identificationInfo>
Rationale
It is not clear if and how this metadata should be supported because it is not mentioned at all in the INSPIRE Technical Guidelines and is defined as optional in the ISO-19115:2003 spec (I don't have access to the ISO-19139 spec but assume it's the same based on the schemas).
However, I believe it would be worth supporting because:
- It is useful metadata, found in the wild in a number of INSPIRE catalogs (from the French administration at least).
- It is mentioned in the GeoNetwork documentation in a page dedicated to INSPIRE, and therefore likely to be used in that context.
- The
adms:status metadata in GeoDCAT-AP seems like a good fit1 and doesn't yet have a mapping in the spec.
I wanted to go ahead and propose a PR for this, but I believe the spec needs work first:
I'd like to suggest adding support for
gmd:status.ISO-19115:2003 definitions
Example
Rationale
It is not clear if and how this metadata should be supported because it is not mentioned at all in the INSPIRE Technical Guidelines and is defined as optional in the ISO-19115:2003 spec (I don't have access to the ISO-19139 spec but assume it's the same based on the schemas).
However, I believe it would be worth supporting because:
adms:statusmetadata in GeoDCAT-AP seems like a good fit1 and doesn't yet have a mapping in the spec.I wanted to go ahead and propose a PR for this, but I believe the spec needs work first:
gmd:MD_ProgressCodecodelist.Footnotes
As suggested by https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/#life-cycle. ↩ ↩2
Mentions of
adms:statusin GeoDCAT-AP are inconsistent: It is specified only at the level ofCatalogRecordas "change type" in section 7.3, but is then only mentioned as part ofDistributionin section 10.3. No mention at theCatalogedResourcelevel, despite DCAT mentioning it in its life-cycle1. The spec also doesn't provide any example for this metadata. ↩