You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#basically my logic here for rule #4 is that any county's population by sex, race, and/or ethnicity should be greater than or equal to 220. So I'll check each record that's not NA
157
170
cat('\n\nProcessing check for low subpopulation demographics in counties (rule #4), should be 0, twice.\n')
Number of observations with higher risk than the main part of the data: 104
2766
+
Expected number of re-identifications: 161.53 (0.00 %)
2767
+
2768
+
k-anon violations ( 0 ) for k=( 5 ) and quasi-identifiers ( race_ethnicity_combined sex age_group ). If greater than zero violations, then here's 5 violations.
2769
+
2770
+
checking l-diversity manually for < pos_spec_dt >, found < 0 > l-diversity violations.
2771
+
[1] race_ethnicity_combined sex age_group pos_spec_dt
Number of observations with higher risk than the main part of the data: 114
2830
+
Expected number of re-identifications: 161.66 (0.00 %)
2831
+
2832
+
k-anon violations ( 0 ) for k=( 5 ) and quasi-identifiers ( race_ethnicity_combined sex age_group ). If greater than zero violations, then here's 5 violations.
2833
+
2834
+
checking l-diversity manually for < pos_spec_dt >, found < 0 > l-diversity violations.
2835
+
[1] race_ethnicity_combined sex age_group pos_spec_dt
0 commit comments